The
life-story of the Veena, an instrument that is considered the soul of Carnatic music and how different shades
and nuances of it are expressed in the hands of different artistes…
T T Narendran
S. Balachander on the veena |
Among the numerous musical instruments that owe
their lineage to India, the Veena occupies a high position. Known by a generic name like
yazhin in Tamil (that was used for several stringed
instruments of historic times) and the modern version, known as the Saraswati Veena
in North India, is now a few centuries old.
Every system of music has a few instruments that are
designed to articulate the accent of the system to which it belongs. One could
think of the piano for western music, the sitar and the shehnai for Hindustani
Music; for Carnatic Music, the nadaswaram and the Veena are, perhaps, the brand
ambassadors. The subtleties/nuances of some of the hard-core Carnatic ragas
such as Bhairavi, Anandabhairavi or Sankarabharanam, emerge most effectively
from these instruments, when handled by a competent and sensitive musician.
The Veena was seen as a versatile instrument that
lent itself to different ways of handling. Traditionally, Andhra Pradesh was
home to an orchestral style, the Tanjavur style from Tamil Nadu was said to
follow a gayaki (vocal-based) approach while Karnataka was said to be a hybrid
of the two. The divisions must have collapsed gradually with the advent of
technology that increased mobility and communication.
Stalwarts of the early 20th
century would include the legendary Veena Dhanammal, Karaikkudi brothers
(Subbarama Iyer and Sambasiva Iyer), Sehanna, Subbana and Venkataramana Das (of
Vijayanagaram). Archival recordings of some of these artists (For example, Dhanammal
and of Karaikkudi Sambasiva Iyer) do exist, providing a clue to the intent rasika
on how the Veena was played in those days. Dhanammal was reputed for ability to
bring subtle nuances of a raga out on the Veena. Karaikkudi brothers were
reputed for a fair degree of audibility to a reasonable crowd even in the
mike less days; their grip over laya was evident in their execution of difficult
pallavis while their overall orientation was towards a gayaki style. Seshanna’s
rich tone helped him connect with the lay listeners with ease. The glorious traditions were carried forth by
the next generation of vainikas that included M K Kalyanakrishna Bhagavathar,
Devakottai Narayana Iyengar, M A Kalyanakrishna
Bhagavathar, K S Narayanaswamy, Mysore V Doreswamy Iyengar and Emani Sankara Sastry.
Narayana Iyengar was a bold innovator within the tradition; on the Veena, he
accompanied the stalwart Ariyakudi Ramanuja Iyengar for a concert at Perambur
Sangeetha Sabha, move that did not quite endure him to his guru, Karaikudi
Sambasiva Iyer. He also paired up with M A Kalyanakrishna Bhagavathar for performances
at prestigious sabhas such as the Music Academy, the venue at which he played
an unforgettable aalaapana of Dhanyasi in a morning concert. Of the two
bhagavathars with the same name, I have heard that M K Kalyanakrishna
Bhagavathar had mastered the instrument to play at incredible speed, while M A Kalyanakrishna
Bhagavathar, who was also an accomplished vocalist, had melody as his forte. K
S Narayanaswamy, a Sangita Bhushanam from Annamalai University during pre-war
times when the university had star-studded faculty on its rolls, showed concern
for grammar as much as he did for aesthetics. His handling of ragas such as Bhairavi
drew high praise from connoisseurs. One memorable occasion was at the Music
Academy in 1968, when he had M S Subbulakshmi accompanying him with the second
Veena. A soulful saveri and an evocative O
jagadamba (Anandabhairavi, Syama Sastry), which M S sang along, remain
etched in the memory of this rasika. Doreswamy Iyengar had an amazing nadam and
was adept at handling ragas familiar and obscure. A fabulous Hamirkalyani, an
abheri with Shuddhadhaivata, Salakabhairavi and Narayanagoula (with tanam) are
among the unforgettable experiences that he provided. Emani Sankara Sastry was
melody personified. Archives will bear testimony to his felicity with a raga as
obscure as Ganamoorti while he was equally effective in his rendition of as
classical a piece as the inimitable Atatalavarnamin Bhairavi.
Meanwhile, there emerged another set of vainikas,
partly overlapping in their careers with the earlier set. There was S
Balachander, the self-taught wizard on the Veena. There could not have been
another like him earlier and there may not be one more like him after his
times, either. Exploiting the instrument to its fullest potential, Balachander
was creativity and innovation personified. He coaxed
melody out of the instrument to portray the richness of the Rakthi ragas, to show
how even the most obscure Vivadimela raga can sound pleasing. He could also
play a popular Raghuvamsa at
break-neck speed. Parallely, there was another popular artist in Chitti Babu, a
disciple of Emani Sankara Sastry. He took the Veena to the masses. Hugely
popular in his hay days, he won audiences over with his sweet tonal quality. He
could play with a slant towards western music, towards folk music and so on.
His cuckoo song was hugely popular.
Two sensitive vainikas who left us in the last
decade were Kalpakam Swaminathan and Trivandrum R Venkataraman. Kalpakam was a
vainika with an exceptional repertoire, particularly of Dikshitarkritis, while
Venkataraman, who had learned from K S Narayanaswamy, had a keen analytical
mind and had acquired extraordinary felicity with the instrument. Both were
essentially based on the vocal tradition and were well-versed in all aspects of
improvisation.
There are talented vainikas at present, too,
showcasing different styles and demonstrating the capabilities of the
instrument in their respective individual styles. The only concern, before
signing off, is the lament from the teachers about the dwindling enrollment of
students for Veena classes and an echo from the vendors of this instrument that
the off-take is falling. One fervently hopes that this will only be a passing
phenomenon.
The writer is a professor at IIT, Madras and a veena player
No comments:
Post a Comment